In time that i was studying in the University of Chile I learn a lot of things, one for these is the method of trial and error that I think that is good because the method doesn’t restrict your creativity and it give us more tools for the next projects.This would be the best thing that it has the program in this moment but if I could change the study programme I probably change some things like the length of studies, I don’t believe that six or seven years in the university will teach me more than four or five years, i believe that the architecture is a practical career and for this reason it needs experience, the seven years could be too much in relation with the time and experience that you need for will be consider an architect front of other professionals.
Other thing that i probably I would change is the infrastructure and the technology, the question
¿How it possible be happening in the U. Chile that in infrastructure of the FAU haven’t workshops for the students?.
¿How it possible be happening in the U. Chile that in infrastructure of the FAU haven’t workshops for the students?.
In general the students can’t work here, or if they do it result very hard for them in a Little space. Besides students need more tool for work and more light tables for drawing .
In the introduction I talk about a good point of teaching method but in some teachers could be use in wrong way because the method could be used for humiliate and denigrate to student.
In Conclusion I think that the Study program is not bad but if want to be good its need a focus that it will give the support to the student
The faculty became small! many classrooms are missing and they must improve the equipment of the classrooms that already exist, such as improving the heating system and adding more plugs.
ResponderEliminarWe are not in an architecture faculty, we are studding literally in a stable.
ResponderEliminar